Kodak EasyShare C180 10.2MP Digital Camera with 3x Optical Zoom and 2.4 inch LCD – Red
Posted by iwellbc on March 2nd, 2010 filed in Articles
- 10.2-megapixel resolution for stunning prints up to 30 x 40 inches
- Kodak AF 3x optical aspheric zoom lens (35 mm equivalent: 32 – 96 mm)
- Capture beautiful HD pictures in 16:9 format; view in high definition on an HDTV or other HD device
- 2.4-inch LCD screen; Face Detection, Blur Reduction features
- Capture images to SD/SDHC memory cards (not included)
Product Description
Kodak EasyShare C180 Digital Camera Red… More >>
Kodak EasyShare C180 10.2MP Digital Camera with 3x Optical Zoom and 2.4 inch LCD – Red
Tags: 10.2MP, 2mp digital, 35 mm, 3x, art and photography, art galleries photography, art gallery photography, art nature photography, art of photography, art photography, art photography books, art photography galleries, art photography gallery, arts photography, black art photography, Blur, C180, camera, capture, color art photography, contemporary art photography, Definition, DescriptionKodak, Detection, device, Digital, digital camera, digital photography art, EasyShare, equivalent, face, face detection, featuresCapture, female art photography, fine art photography, format, hd, HDTV, high definition, images, inch, inch lcd screen, inchesKodak, Kodak, kodak easyshare, LCD, lens, megapixel, memory, Optical, photography as art, photography in art, Product, red, reduction, resolution, screen, screen face, SDHC, sdhc memory cards, stunning prints, the art of photography, the art photography, view, zoom
March 3rd, 2010 at 2:06 am
No Card, No instructions booklet, very very low internal memory. I bought it, took it to an even, and could not use it. Seller did not offer a card to me. Even my cheapie HP and Take-It digital cameras came with cards.
I returned the item.
Rating: 1 / 5
March 3rd, 2010 at 3:24 am
I took 6 photos, and got the “memory full” signal. Also, the viewfinder was not a good indicator of what the picture would be. My granddaughter says it is “clunky” for what it does (not much), and it should have a battery charger. On “ease of use”, I would give it a 1 out of 10.
Rating: 1 / 5
March 3rd, 2010 at 4:00 am
For this amount of money, you can get a Canon with much better quality. The Kodaks have light leaks so when pointed perpendicular to the sun, you get red blobs. The Kodaks shoot 640×240 & upscale it. There’s no manual control of anything. Picture quality sux. Video encoding sux. Red blobs suck.
Rating: 1 / 5
March 3rd, 2010 at 4:18 am
My camera came in time for Christmas and was the worst piece of equipment I have ever recieved. It would only take and store two pics…quality bad…,it would not save backups to the disk and the fully charged battery kept running out after 5 minutes. It seems I got the only lemon of these; I’ve sent it back to amazon for my refund and will buy another camera at a reputable dealer.
Rating: 1 / 5
March 3rd, 2010 at 4:21 am
It’s an ok camera except you can’t playback stuff videotaped because there’s no speaker for sound so you can’t hear anything. Also, you have to use batteries which can be a pain sometimes.
Rating: 2 / 5